When designing a bridge, engineers calculate the strains the material can withstand, but they must also make calculations for the probable post-earthquake functionality of the structure. UBC professor Shahria Alam states that "We've determined it's very unnecessary to design a structure with that much reinforcement. The code calls for a lot of material and the size of the columns and beams are simply too large." According to the professor, the up-to-now common technique of adding more steel reinforcement to make structures stronger now seems false, and the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code may eventually be revised. “Public safety is the most important aspect and we have to build structures so they do not collapse during an earthquake,” he continues. “What we’re saying now is that we should be building structures that not only save lives, but we should also be saving the structure itself.” Alam and his team have proposed target residual drift-based criteria for performance-based seismic design of bridges that have self-centering capability, in order for the engineers to be able to build almost damage-free bridges even after a major earthquake.
Student Peng Zhang traces cracks in the column during a strength test in UBC Okanagan’s Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures. (Image courtesy of University of British Columbia Okanagan campus)
Test leader Mosharef Hossain, right, along with fellow UBC engineering student Rashedul Kabir, left, carefully inspect a concrete column after it has been put through a lengthy shake test at UBC Okanagan’s Applied Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Structures. (Image courtesy of University of British Columbia Okanagan campus)
Source: UBC Okanagan News